Skip to main content

This One React Hook Streamlines Every Project I Build

 


I’m debugging a React app for a client who insists the page should update “instantly” when users click a button.

I’m knee-deep in state variables, loading flags, try-catch blocks, and a mental breakdown.

My useEffect Looks like a spaghetti monster mated with a JSON dump.

Then it hits me: Why the hell am I writing this boilerplate over and over again?

That night, I built the one hook that changed everything: useAsync().



Edited by me

The Nightmare That Birthed a Hook

You’ve probably lived this too. Fetching data? Here comes a mess of:

const [data, setData] = useState(null);
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const [error, setError] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
setLoading(true);
fetch(url)
.then((res) => res.json())
.then(setData)
.catch(setError)
.finally(() => setLoading(false));
}, [url]);
Gross. Repetitive. Bug prone.

So I ripped it out. Abstracted it. And gave it a new home:

Say Hello to useAsync()

Here’s what it looks like:

const { data, error, loading, run } = useAsync();
useEffect(() => {
run(() => fetchDataFromAPI());
}, []);

Or even better:

const { data, loading, error } = useAsync(() => fetchDataFromAPI(), []);
Clean. Declarative. Sexy.

No more duplicating loading state logic.

No more 8 lines of async wrappers per component.

Just pass your function. The hook handles the ugly parts.

What It Does (Under the Hood)

The hook accepts an async function, executes it, and tracks:

  • loading: boolean (self-explanatory)
  • errorThe caught error object
  • data: the resolved value

It handles cancellation (yep, no memory leaks from zombie fetches). And you can trigger it on mount or manually via .run().

Here’s the core idea:

function useAsync(fn, deps = []) {
const [data, setData] = useState(null);
const [error, setError] = useState(null);
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
const run = useCallback(async () => {
setLoading(true);
setError(null);
try {
const result = await fn();
setData(result);
} catch (err) {
setError(err);
} finally {
setLoading(false);
}
}, deps);
useEffect(() => {
if (fn) run();
}, [run]);
return { data, error, loading, run };
}

Why You’ll Want It Too

Let’s be honest.

Frontend work is already chaotic.

We juggle user events, server responses, global state, and UX edge cases like a caffeinated octopus.

So anything that:

  • Reduces repeated patterns
  • Makes components cleaner
  • Handles loading/error logic once and forever

…is worth tattooing on your IDE.

This hook turned my janky useEffect-graveyards into clean, readable, business-logic-focused components.

But Wait — Why Not React Query or SWR?

Great tools. Love ’em.

Use them on bigger apps. But sometimes?

You just need a lightweight custom hook.

No config. No caching. No dependency injection. Just pure async logic control.

Think: internal dashboards, admin panels, MVPs. Places where simplicity wins.

This hook is my go-to in those cases. And it never lets me down.

Reality — This Hook Saves You From Yourself

Because let’s be real: it’s not just about code reusability. It’s about,

  • Preventing bugs when you forget to reset loading
  • Avoiding nested try-catch hell
  • Making junior devs say, “Whoa, that’s clean.”

It’s a form of self-care. The React version of drinking enough water.

Finally, You Deserve Clean Code

If you’re writing async logic in React and not abstracting it, you’re wasting time and sanity.

useAsync() Is a tiny hook with big benefits. Make it. Customize it. Use it.

Hell, tattoo it on your forehead if you must.

What’s your go-to hook?
Have you built your own useAsync variant?
Still clinging to useEffect spaghetti?

Drop a comment. Start a flame war. Or just clap if you felt the same pain.

Let’s talk hooks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sharpen Your Front-End Skills: Quick HTML, CSS & React Interview Challenges

  The source of this image is Chat GPT based on writing! Are you preparing for front-end developer interviews and looking for practical, hands-on ways to improve your HTML, CSS, and React skills? Whether you’re a beginner aiming to build confidence or an experienced developer brushing up on UI skills, small, targeted challenges can make a huge difference. In this article, I’ll walk you through some of the best free and low-cost resources that offer real-world front-end tasks — perfect for interview prep, portfolio building, and daily practice. 1. Frontend Mentor frontendmentor.io Frontend Mentor is one of the most popular platforms for hands-on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript challenges. You get beautifully designed templates (in Figma or image formats) and are asked to bring them to life using clean code. The platform offers difficulty levels ranging from newbie to expert, and it’s perfect for practicing responsiveness and semantic HTML. Bonus : You can even filter for React-based ...

React Native vs React JS — Key Difference, Advantages-Disadvantages, Limitations

  React Native vs React JS — Key Difference, Advantages-Disadvantages, Limitations React JS It is a JavaScript library that supports each face and server-side. It’s a popularly used library that focuses on developing user interfaces for mobile and internet-primarily based applications. React Native It is a cross-platform mobile framework that uses the ReactJS framework. It’s primarily used for developing native mobile applications like Windows, iOS and mechanical man. The major advantage provided by React Native is that it permits the developers to form mobile applications on varied platforms while not compromising the tip user’s expertise. Components of React JS Components of React Native Basic parts View — it is the essential building block of internet applications. Text — It helps to point out the text. The text element contains nesting, styling, and bit handling. Image — this is often a React element for showing multiple footages like network pictures and static resources. Text...

Difference Between Three.js and Babylon.js: What Actually Should You Choose?

You don’t have to be just a graphic designer to create interactive designs. You can be a coder and still create visually appealing and eye-catching games. All thanks to JavaScript. The first cross-browser JavaScript library–three.js–that can create 3D computer graphics was first released on 24 April 2010 by Ricardo Cabello. He first wrote the code in ActionScript language, which was then used by Adobe Flash. But then in 2009, he ported the code to JavaScript. Previously, people used WebGL. But the problem was its limitation: it can create only simple pointers and lines. Ricardo, instead of abandoning WebGL as something that is futile, used it to his own advantage. He built three.js on top of WebGL. This renders three.js to create 3D graphics in the browser. Even a 3D scene can be created easily using Canvas and WebGL now. But then in 2013, Babylon.js was created. But why? Why did its creators, Microsoft and David Catuhe, make something that another JavaScript library–three.js –was alre...